Sunday, December 11, 2011
Saturday, November 26, 2011
We have the black iPod classic 160GB version. Brenda's is the older model, the one where it is possible to disable the European cap, and sadly mine is more recent where, for the moment, the cap cannot be disabled (keep working on it, guys!).
But it's not the European cap that causes the most irritation. It's the fact that proprietary software is needed to actually use it. We are Windoze-free in our house so this means the iPod comes with a problem: how does one put music on it? I have been using gtkpod (thanks, guys, what a great utility!) but I have found a problem with it. When one uses gtkpod to update two different iPods from the same desktop it seems that gtkpod can get confused regarding which model the iPod is. I managed to trash Brenda's iPod, i.e. get it into the state where music is on it but the iPod reckons it is not there. It reckoned the iPod was empty in fact. Eventually I managed to fix this by editing the file /media/IPOD/iPod_Control/Device/SysInfo, removing the line that refers to the model name. If you do this then gtkpod prompts for it and this time I put the correct value in.
When you read the various posts on the web about how to make the iPod recognise that music is there that has been placed by gtkpod, they all say you need to give the firewire id. What they don't tell you is that the model name also has to be accurate. If either is missing or wrong then you get this problem. During my attempts to diagnose and fix the problem I did a factory reset and wiped all the music from Brenda's iPod. Luckily I have all the music on an external USB drive so I will be able to restore it. But why does Apple create this pain for all it's users? Cowon does not bother creating proprietary software for its MP3 players. To load a Cowon player you just drag and drop. Simple, eh? What a pity that the largest capacity MP3 player by Cowon is a mere 32GB (the S9).
I am patiently waiting for RockBox to support the iPod classic. I use RockBox on my ancient iRiver H30 and it is fabulous. What a pity I can't use it on the iPod yet. What a pity that I am not technical enough to help with the porting. The code really is quite hairy to a novice such as me. I know, I've looked.
I can't wait for Cowon to create a large capacity player. They have a tablet that does the job (the X7) but the tablet is just that little bit too large for Brenda to take to the gym. But the spec is great. It even plays FLAC and Ogg Vorbis, which of course, Apple does not do. Come on Cowon! Just go that little bit further and I'm sure your sales will skyrocket!
Monday, November 14, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
- I downloaded a netbook ISO image for Maverick Meerkat
- I created a bootable USB drive containing the ISO image. I used unetbootin-linux-549, which I built from a source code download.
- I booted the network using the USB stick and did the install.
- I used the lspci command to reveal that the wireless hardware is a RealTek 8176.
- I googled and found someone with the same problem asking for help on a forum. The web page no longer worked but luckily it was still available in the google cache. Some kind person answered with a very detailed step by step set of instructions. I also tried them and they worked for me too!
The instructions are as follows:
- sudo su
- add-apt-repository ppa:lexical/hwe-wireless
- apt-get update
- apt-get install rtl8192ce-dkms,
This went through a long rigmarole and eventually said
Building initial module for 2.6.35-24-generic Done. r8192ce_pci.ko: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - No original module exists within this kernel - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/2.6.35-24-generic/updates/dkms/ depmod....... DKMS: install Completed.At this point I rebooted and after the reboot it just worked. Wow.
Sunday, July 03, 2011
No-one cares about computers and security.
I care. I am quite interested in computer security from a technical point of view. I also want to keep my data and credentials safe from prying eyes and corruption/deletion, accidental or otherwise and misuse.
However, I now believe that among computer users I am on my own. The only other people that seem to be interested are security consultants. But then they have something to sell. I find this annoying because computer security is important for a number of reasons that really do have the potential to adversely affect me when not done right.
- My money. Is it safe? Do the retail banks take responsibility for making sure that it is not easily stolen and that the account is resistant to fraud? No, they don't. Everyone's bank account is at risk. So are their credit cards and debit cards.
- My personal details. Will they end up in the hands of spammers and junk mailers. Yes, they will. The people that had these details for perfectly legitimate reasons cannot be trusted to look after them responsibly or even with basic competency. This is why everyone is taking to shredding everything these days.
- Impersonation. Will someone be able to log to my online-account, pretend to me, and do all sorts of horrible things in my name? Yes, they can. Newspapers are full of these stories happening more and more often. Do you think your Facebook account is secure? How about your Twitter account? Your PayPal account? Your Amazon account?
- Computer breakins. I want my computer to remain mine and no-one else is allowed in. Thankfully I don't use Microsoft Windows so this greatly increases my chances. However, security holes are discovered in commonly used software every day, including the software that runs on Linux. My own machines are regular attacked using port scanning and password guessing.
- Privacy. I want the stuff that I do on my computers to be private. AFAIK only the UK government have passed a special law that grants them the right to force your decryption keys from you. Also, when using encryption there is the problem that most other people don't know anything about it. It is hard to communicate securely with people that are not interested in keeping the communication secure.
Although I say I care, I have stopped caring in certain areas. This is because I have just got fed up of security not being done right so that it hinders work, even hinders real security and certainly does not provide it. My boss put it so well when he said "security is that which impedes the developer whilst at the same time not offering security".
These areas are listed below.
- o Passwords. I write them down. I keep the number small by reusing them across systems. They are drawn from a small list of passwords that I use over and over. I often don't make them a complex mixture of numbers, letters and special symbols as is recommended. They are often based on words that make them vunerable to a dictionary attack. I keep them all in a notebook in my desk drawer.
- Usernames. I tend to use the same one every time. Yes, it is based on my name.
- I tell people my username and password. Well, at least I do at work. Well at least I would if anyone was interested or asked. The workplace is where security is just a joke so this doesn't matter as far as I am concerned.
- I lend people my security pass. No-one looks at the pass anyway, it is just used to open the door locks. I never wear my pass, I keep it in my pocket.
- I don't lock my terminal when leaving it unattended. The corporate environment tends to force a lock after a very brief period of inactivity so I find myself subconsciously rebelling.
- When I briefly leave my desk I leave the drawer unlocked with the notebook inside containing all my passwords.
- I share my main working directory with everyone indiscrimanently using Windoze Shares and lax permissions. Windoze is not secure anyway, FTP, telnet and CIFS protocols sends usernames and passwords over the wire in plaintext anyway, so what's the problem?
- I don't use two-factor authentication. Well actually I would like to but it would be really useful, like looking after the money in my bank account for example, it is not even offered.
- I don't use public key encryption for sensitive communication. Actually I refuse to use email for sensitive communication. I would like to use public key encryption but usually the person at the other end of the communication does not understand the need and is incapable of using public key encryption so I try to find another way, e.g a face to face meeting or using the telephone (which is not secure either).
- I don't digitally sign anything. After all, no-one uses or understands public key encryption anyway.
- I don't use an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). Actually I did try out an IDS once which is how I know my machines do get attacked. But I never use an IDS at my clients site. They don't use one either. Tough luck. And those systems are typically Windoze-based where a breakin will happen sooner or later.
- I don't use a virus scanner. Well, I use Linux at home, which is a much smaller target for crackers and malware. My clients, being typically Windoze-based, will use whatever the corporate standard is for a virus checker. It is typically configured to not update each day but rather at the behest of the 'security' department. It is often either partially or completely disabled since the continual disk scanning slowers the machine down for developers (word processing users don't notice).
- Whenever I receive a Word or Excel document containing macros I enable them without any consideration of the potential consequences. Such is life in the corporate world. Of course at home I don't use Microsoft Office so it's not a problem there.
- I use Internet Exploiter as my web browser. At home I use Firefox of course. But Firefox has yet to be discovered by the corporate world. IE is still the standard on the desktop and provides a rich source of attack vectors, drive-by-shootings etc.
- I use software that sends usernames and passwords over the wire in plaintext. The most commonly used is FTP. I would like to use secure protocols/commands such as sftp, ssh etc but these have yet to be discovered by the corporate world.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Mysteriously, it hung when it got to the bit where it runs the CUDA compiler. I tried building the project interactively in Visual Studio from the Jenkins sandbox. This also hung at the same point. Process Explorer revealed CUDA was consuming roughly 25% CPU but making no progress. It was stuck in a CPU loop. Process Explorer revealed that it was in that part of the compiler that does the preprocessing, so it should have been really fast.
After a lot of tinkering in Jenkins, renaming the project, rebuilding the sandbox, reinstalling CUDA etc etc I eventually fixed the problem. It turns out that CUDA seems to be sensitive to the path that it is running in. If any part of the path contains a directory whose name begins with a dot, then you get the CPU loop. This is unfortunate because Jenkins likes to run in $HOME/.jenkins. When I picked a different Jenkins home (setting JENKINS_HOME via the control panel) and called the directory jenkins rather than .jenkins, then CUDA started working again. Weird, huh? For good measure, I renamed the job so that it did not contain any spaces (Jenkins creates a directory named after the job). I am not sure if this has any effect or not but getting rid of the leading dot definately fixed the problem.